Table of Contents |
Clinical Image
| ||||||
A pulmonary abscess due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase 3 | ||||||
Maria Ana Canelas1, Tatiana Fonseca1 | ||||||
1Internal Medicine Residents, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal.
| ||||||
| ||||||
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] |
How to cite this article |
Canelas MA, Fonseca T. A pulmonary abscess due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase 3. J Case Rep Images Med 2016;2:86–88. |
Case Report
| ||||||
An 81-year-old male, with recurrent respiratory tract infections, and multiple antibiotherapy cycles in the previous three months, was admitted in the emergency department, referring fever and dyspnea for one week. Clinical, laboratory and imaging findings led to admission for pneumonia with respiratory failure. On the X-ray (Figure 1): "round hypotransparency, cavitated, in the right lower base". For better characterization it was performed a chest CT scan (Figure 2) that revealed "bulky image, cavitated, with thick walls and polilobulated and heterogeneous, in the right inferior lobe, measuring 66x55 mm". It was first initiated, empirically, clindamycin, for 20 days. Nevertheless, there was not improvement, and so, it was executed a bronchoscopy, allowing the isolation of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (clone ST 147) on the bronchoalveolar lavage. The antibiogram showed: sensitivity to amikacin; CIM Meropenem: =8 mg/L; antibiogram: <2 mg/L; CIM colistin: ≤1.5 mg/L. He was then started on meropenem 2 g three-times per day and amikacin 500 mg twice per day, for 30 days, with improvement on the chest CT control (Figure 3), being discharged, after 97 days. | ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Discussion
| ||||||
After an outbreak of KPC-3 (expressing the gene VIM-1) in our hospital, a protocol of treatment trial was implemented, being of the most value the antibiogram. Misidentification of KPC is common with standard susceptibility testing. The most easily performed confirmatory test is the modified Hodge test, which has been found to be 100% sensitive, although not specific. Definite confirmation of KPC production requires molecular methods such as PCR [1]. There is some debate concerning the appropriate dosage and the most favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles in this cases [2] [3], but unfortunately the optimal treatment is unknown. The use of aminoglycosides, polymyxin combinations and tigecycline appeared to have higher success rates. Carbapenem and polymyxin monotherapy had much lower associated success rates [4]. Literature describes a wide range of approaches, from simple conservative treatments associated with specific antibiotic therapy, to surgical intervention, using endoscopic or percutaneous drainage [5]. Elores, a combination of ceftriaxone, disodium edetate and sulbactam, showed high susceptibility to KPC and Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing pathogens, including the ones expressing VIM-1 [6]. The reason comes for the synergic activity from the Elores combination, with reports of efficacy and safety, and its use can be considered a drug of choice for treating KPC [7]. In our case, we report a more conservative treatment, with the use of high-dose of a carbapenem associated with an aminoglycoside, for a long period, with a favorable outcome. Furthermore, in our case, Elores could not be used, since disodium edetate it is not available in our country, and the antibiogram showed resistance to ceftriaxone. | ||||||
Conclusion
| ||||||
The lack of published material and the emergency of these multirresistente microorganisms it is a challenge in the development of new treatment, control and prevention strategies. In the more serious cases of infections due to KPC, like abscesses, their adequate drainage, when possible, and the most appropriate antibiotic scheme showed a better outcome. Keywords: Abscess, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Multirresistente microorganisms, Outbreak | ||||||
Acknowledgements
| ||||||
All the staff members who were involved in the care of the patient. | ||||||
References
| ||||||
|
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
|
Author Contributions
Maria Ana Canelas – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Tatiana Fonseca – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
Source of support
None |
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Copyright
© 2016 Maria Ana Canelas et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|